|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 120-124
Knowledge, beliefs, and practices of people with Type 2 diabetes toward self-management and diabetic foot
Hani Naguib1, Shiju Raman1, Avinash Pinto2, Aisha Al Mehrezi3, Aziza Al Hinaii3
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Bausher Polyclinic, Al Nahda Hospital, Muscat, Oman
2 Centre of Studies and Research, Directorate General of Planning and Studies, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman
3 Department of Podiatry, Bausher Polyclinic, Al Nahda Hospital, Muscat, Oman
|Date of Submission||12-Jun-2021|
|Date of Decision||07-Jul-2021|
|Date of Acceptance||09-Jul-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||26-Aug-2021|
Dr. Hani Naguib
Department of Internal Medicine, Bausher Polyclinic, Al Nahda Hospital, Muscat
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Introduction: Diabetic foot syndrome is one of the most common and devastating preventable complications of diabetes mellitus. Knowledge and awareness about the disease can have a positive influence on attitude and practices of patients. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the knowledge, beliefs, and practices (KBPs) regarding diabetes and diabetic foot syndrome among Omani type 2 diabetic patients. Patients and Methods: We studied 150 participants from the diabetes clinic, Bausher Polyclinic, Muscat. A questionnaire was used to determine KBPs around diabetic foot care. Results: There were 90 females and 60 males, 67.9% were older than 50 years, 42.7% were illiterate, and 72% of them were not working or retired. Only 38% checked their feet regularly; 5.6% had diabetic foot syndrome. Over half of the respondents (55.3%) did not know the causes of diabetic foot syndrome and half of the respondents did not know symptoms of the same. Just over one-third (37.3%) thought that their doctor alone was responsible for foot examination. Only 32.7% thought that they should examine their own feet. The majority believed that walking barefoot and diabetic foot syndrome are “big” problems (84% and 80%, respectively). More than three-quarters (78%) reported checking water temperature before use, 38.7% use warm water for washing feet, and 39.3% reported drying their feet after washing. Only 38% check their feet regularly. Finally, only one-third confirmed checking their blood sugar regularly. Conclusions: The KBP triad must be interconnected in order to achieve successful preventive foot care.
Keywords: Attitude, diabetic foot, knowledge, practices
|How to cite this article:|
Naguib H, Raman S, Pinto A, Al Mehrezi A, Al Hinaii A. Knowledge, beliefs, and practices of people with Type 2 diabetes toward self-management and diabetic foot. J Diabetes Endocr Pract 2021;4:120-4
|How to cite this URL:|
Naguib H, Raman S, Pinto A, Al Mehrezi A, Al Hinaii A. Knowledge, beliefs, and practices of people with Type 2 diabetes toward self-management and diabetic foot. J Diabetes Endocr Pract [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 20];4:120-4. Available from: https://www.jdeponline.com/text.asp?2021/4/3/120/324792
| Introduction|| |
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major public health problem with social and financial implications for countries regardless of their economic status., Countries of the Arabian Gulf region have witnessed an unprecedented rise in the prevalence of noncommunicable diseases, including diabetes The prevalence of diabetes in Oman has increased over the past three decades in parallel with rapid economic growth, urbanization, and changes in lifestyle behaviors. Recent estimates show that 14.5% of Omanis aged ≥18 years have diabetes.
Diabetic foot disease (DFD) is one of the common and devastating albeit preventable DM complications. It is associated with increased morbidity and premature mortality. Lower extremity disease including foot ulceration, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral arterial disease, or amputation is twice as common as in people with diabetes than healthy individuals. The annual incidence of foot ulcer in people with DM ranges from 1.0% to 4.1%. There are some data suggesting an annual incidence of diabetic foot ulceration of 6.3%, and the cumulative risk of developing a foot ulcer in people with diabetes is estimated to be 19%–34%., Lower-limb amputation is at least 10–20 times more common in people with diabetes than in those without diabetes. Up to 75% of amputations are performed in people with diabetes. The 5-year mortality rate following diabetes-related lower-limb amputation is as high as 40%–80%. In Oman, 47.3% of all lower-limb amputations are performed on people with diabetes, with the annual rate ranging between 20 and 36/10,000.
The Omani diabetes guidelines recommend comprehensive annual foot screening for all patients, irrespective of their foot risk status. Furthermore, it stipulates that primary care physicians refer all patients with peripheral neuropathy to a podiatrist at secondary health-care services or to the designated National Diabetes and Endocrine Center for assessment and further management. Secondary care diabetes foot services include dedicated high-risk foot clinics, specialist assessment, and management of established and severe cases of DFD. Patients with DFD who require inpatient treatment or surgical intervention should be managed in tertiary care hospitals.
Several studies showed that knowledge and awareness about diabetes have a positive impact on attitude and practices of patients (Serrano and Jacob, 2010). Patients who engage in effective self-management are more likely to achieve treatment goals. However, gaps in knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) still exist. A remarkable number of patients are not effectively managing their condition nor implementing lifestyle changes in a way that can reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with diabetes. We have, therefore, conducted to assess the knowledge, beliefs, and practices (KBPs) of 150 adult patients with T2DM attending the Bausher Polyclinic.
| Patients and Methods|| |
Design and objectives
This was a cross-sectional study conducted during April 2020–September 2020 at the outpatient clinic of Bausher Polyclinic in Muscat region of the Sultanate of Oman. We used a questionnaire to evaluate the KBPs of Omani patients diagnosed with T2DM.
We have included 150 T2DM patients who participated in the study. The inclusion criteria were being a person with type 2 diabetes and older than 20 years of age. Patients with any form of antidiabetic therapy were included. We have excluded patients who declined to provided consent to be part of the study and patients who already had established diabetic foot syndrome, amputated foot, or foot ulcers.
The questionnaire was combined, modified, revised, and validated to better align with the Omani diabetes and Omani diabetic foot guidelines. The revised questionnaire covered six domains: demographic details, patient-reported diabetes-related foot disease, foot self-care, diabetes care education, foot care education, and professional foot care. A questionnaire containing 40 closed-ended and multiple-choice questions on knowledge, practice, and belief of patients was developed to investigate the relationship between KAP of T2DM patients. The questionnaire also contained items to assess social, economic, and clinical profiles, family history of T2DM, years of conviviality with the pathology, and knowledge-related questions of measures to prevent diabetic foot, attitudes to prevent it, and self-care practices of the person with T2DM. One point was awarded for each correct answer. The questionnaire had been tried on five patients to assess the validity, suitability of content, clarity, and flow of questions. Necessary corrections and modifications were made based on the results of the pilot study. The questionnaire was prepared in English but, prior to use in the study, was translated to Arabic. The Arabic version of the questionnaire was reviewed for language, clarity, and structure and was administered in face-to-face interviews to collect data.
For analysis, a total of nine items were included in the knowledge section which incorporated elementary knowledge of diabetes, benefits of exercise, complications of diabetes, and prevention of diabetic foot. For the nine items and knowledge questions, the maximum attainable score was “9” and the minimum score was “0.” Likewise, in the belief section, a total of eight items were included which consisted of respondents' belief toward diabetes. A three-point Likert scale was used to measure attitude. Each positive response (agree) carried a score of 1, and each negative response carried a score of 0. For the eight belief-related questions, the maximum attainable score was 8 and the minimum score was 0. Similarly, for the 16 items in the practice category, such as glucose monitoring, physician visit, weight management, exercise, and foot care, the maximum attainable score was 16 and the minimum was 0. The combined level of KAP (KBP) was classified according to each respondent's score. Poor knowledge and practice corresponded to a low score of (<mean − 1 SD); average knowledge and practice corresponded to a score between (mean ± 1 SD); good knowledge and practice corresponded to a score of (>mean ± 1 SD).
| Results|| |
Profile of the study population
The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population are shown in [Table 1]. The majority (87.9%) of the patients were aged 40 years and above. There were more females (60%) than males. There was a high rate of illiteracy and low educational attainment levels [Table 1]. Nearly three-quarters of the patients (72%) were unemployed or retired. Over three-quarters (76%) had diabetes for <10 years, 16% had diabetes for 10–20 years, and 8% had diabetes for more than 20 years. The majority (70%) had a positive family history of diabetes.
|Table 1: Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the study population|
Click here to view
Most of the respondents (84.6%) did not know the causes of diabetes [Table 2]. Three-quarters (74.7%) did not know what “normal” blood sugar levels were. Over half of the respondents (55.3%) did not know the causes of diabetic foot syndrome and half of the respondents did not know symptoms of the same. Just over one-third (37.3%) thought that their doctor alone was responsible for foot examination, 37.3% did not know about diabetes complications, 36.7% did not know how to prevent diabetic foot syndrome, and 36% did not know risk factors that cause the disease. Only 32.7% thought that they should examine their own feet.
|Table 2: Percentages of correct responses to the salient questions in the three domains|
Click here to view
The majority believed that walking barefoot and diabetic foot syndrome are “big” problems (84% and 80%, respectively) [Table 2]. Over two-thirds (67.4%) believed that patients with diabetes cannot eat everything even if they are compliant with medications. One-third (30.7%) thought that checking their blood sugar was the responsibility of their doctor only. A small proportion of respondents believed that diabetes cannot be fully treated (18%) and that uncontrolled diabetes is not a serious problem (12%).
The majority of the respondents (72%) denied walking barefoot, and 60.7% stated that they check with their doctor if they have a foot problem [Table 2]. Moreover, 61.8% stated that they have been physically active for the previous year and 41.2% reported being physical active three to five times a week and 32.4% were physically active for 30 min or less. More than three-quarters of the participants (78%) reported checking water temperature before use, 38.7% use warm water for washing feet, and 39.3% reported drying their feet after washing. Only (38%) check their feet regularly. Finally, only one-third confirmed checking their blood sugar regularly.
The concordance between the percentage of correct affirmative responses to similar questions in the three survey domains is presented in [Table 3].
|Table 3: The concordance between the percentage of correct affirmative responses to similar questions in the three survey domains (knowledge, beliefs, and practices)|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Globally, it is estimated that 50%–60% of diabetic patients will develop peripheral neuropathy and 15% of patients with diabetes will develop foot ulcers. Of those who develop ulcers, 20% will require amputation at different levels of the foot.
Knowledge is an essential requirement for better compliance with medical therapy. Awareness of complications of diabetes was not enough among the patients in this study. Eighty-four percent of the patients did not know the cause of DM; 37.3% did not know about diabetes complications; 55.3% did not know the cause of diabetic foot syndrome; 50% did not know about symptoms of diabetic foot.
In the present study, the majority of the patients (60%) were illiterate or can simply read and write. This must have serious implications on their ability to learn about diabetes and its management. Even primary education level was significantly associated with low diabetes KAP score. Patients had insufficient knowledge regarding the symptoms, complications, prevention, and control of disease condition. In terms of attitude and beliefs, a considerable disposition to practice self-examination and self-care was evident. This was reflected in the gaps reported in practice. Important practices such as regularly monitoring blood glucose levels and checking feet daily were not being conducted. 74.7% did not know what their normal blood sugar level was. Only 33.3% of patients were regularly checking their blood sugar. The majority of the patients in the study reported that they only checked their blood sugar at their 3-month checkup with their doctor.
32.7% understood that they should examine their own feet on a regular basis and 84% agreed that walking barefoot carries a high risk for development of diabetic foot complications. This finding could be related to a lack of knowledge and lack of organized diabetes education services in the diabetes clinic. Our findings indicate that KBPs must be interconnected in order to achieve successful preventive foot care. Poor knowledge regarding diabetes has been reported in several studies from developing countries.,, While, another study in the UK reported poor knowledge of diabetes among ethnic groups. Previous studies have highlighted that low levels of literacy and education are associated with lack of knowledge of diabetes foot care.,, A study from Malaysia reported a good KAP score among diabetic patients. The differences in the results of studies may be due to the differences in educational level of the diabetic patients and accessibility of information and diabetes education.
Awareness of complications of diabetes was low among the patients. This may be due to some factors such as inappropriate ways of providing information. There are some noteworthy limitations of the study; perhaps, the sample size of 150 patients from a single clinic may limit the generalizability of the results. Recruiting a larger sample from different institutions and including clinics would enhance the generalizability of the findings for future studies. The intention was to enroll our sample of 150 patients into educational sessions and reassess their KBPs before and after the intervention.
This is a high-cost treatment for health-care providers and a poor outcome in terms of quality of life for patients. Lack of awareness about the complications of diabetes among patients affects their ability to self-manage and has a negative impact on outcome of diabetes. A joint effort on the part of health-care professionals and patients is required in terms of increasing knowledge, awareness, and changing practice regarding diabetic foot care. This study highlighted low levels of knowledge about diabetes and practices to prevent diabetic foot syndrome among patients with low levels of literacy and educational attainment. It highlights the need for the development of diabetes education programs which take into account factors such as context, literacy, educational level, and health beliefs of patients, so they are effective and easily understood. Key behaviors with regard to foot care need to be emphasized. All patients newly diagnosed with diabetes should be enrolled in education about diabetic foot care. Educational programs should be continuous across primary and secondary care settings. All health-care professionals should be delivering the same key messages regarding diabetic foot care.
| Conclusions|| |
The KBP triad must be interconnected in order to achieve successful preventive foot care. We need dialog with the patient utilizing a motivational interviewing approach. Understanding the level of knowledge and practice in patients with diabetes is important in planning for better control of diabetes and its complications.
The authors are grateful to Dr. Thamra Al Ghafry (Muscat) and Ms. Mary MacCalum (UK) for inspiring, editing, and proofreading and also for Dr. Hanan Al Mahrooqi (Bausher Polyclinic) for her logistics support. We are also grateful to Dr. Hamad al Harthy and Dr. Mohamed Al Hinaii (Alnahda Hospital) for their support during the study.
All authors participated in the conception of study, data collection and analysis, and drafting and revising of the manuscript. They have all approved the final version of the article.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Compliance with ethical principles
Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics and Research Review Committee of the Directorate General of Muscat region. Informed written consent was obtained from all respondents.
| References|| |
Bommer C, Heesemann E, Sagalova V, Manne-Goehler J, Atun R, Bärnighausen T, et al.
The global economic burden of diabetes in adults aged 20-79 years: A cost-of-illness study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017;5:423-30.
Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW, et al.
IDF diabetes atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018;138:271-81.
Alhyas L, McKay A, Balasanthiran A, Majeed A. Quality of type 2 diabetes management in the states of the co-operation council for the Arab States of the Gulf: A systematic review. PLoS One 2011;6:e22186.
Al-Lawati JA, Panduranga P, Al-Shaikh HA, Morsi M, Mohsin N, Khandekar RB, et al.
Epidemiology of diabetes mellitus in Oman: Results from two decades of research. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2015;15:e226-33.
Ministry of Health. Oman STEPS Survey Fact Sheet. Muscat, Oman: Ministry of Health; 2017.
Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA 2005;293:217-28.
Zhang P, Lu J, Jing Y, Tang S, Zhu D, Bi Y. Global epidemiology of diabetic foot ulceration: A systematic review and meta-analysis †
. Ann Med 2017;49:106-16.
Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2367-75.
Moxey PW, Gogalniceanu P, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, Jones KJ, Thompson MM, et al.
Lower extremity amputations – A review of global variability in incidence. Diabet Med 2011;28:1144-53.
Narres M, Kvitkina T, Claessen H, Droste S, Schuster B, Morbach S, et al.
Incidence of lower extremity amputations in the diabetic compared with the non-diabetic population: A systematic review. PLoS One 2017;12:e0182081.
Al-Busaidi IS, Abdulhadi NN, Coppell KJ. Care of patients with diabetic foot disease in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2016;16:e270-6.
Ministry of Health. Diabetes Mellitus Management Guidelines. 3rd
ed. Oman: Ministry of Health; 2015.
Al-Busaidi IS. Diabetic foot disease in Oman: A call for more research. Oman Med J 2017;32:354-5.
Gul N. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of type 2 diabetic patients. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2010;22:128-31.
Chellan G, Srikumar S, Varma AK, Mangalanandan TS, Sundaram KR, Jayakumar RV, et al.
Foot care practice-the key to prevent diabetic foot ulcers in India. Foot (Edinb) 2012;22:298-302.
Upadhyay DK, Palaian S, Shankar PR, Mishra P, Pokhara N. Knowledge, attitude and practice about diabetes among diabetes patients in Western Nepal. Rawal Med J 2008;33:8-11.
Gunay T, Ulusel B, Velipasaoglu S, Unal B, Ucku R, Ozgener N. Factors affecting adult knowledge of diabetes in Narlidere Health District, Turkey. Acta Diabetol 2006;43:142-7.
Baradaran H, Knill-Jones R. Assessing the knowledge, attitudes and understanding of type 2 diabetes amongst ethnic groups in Glasgow, Scotland. Pract Diabetes Int 2004;21:143-8.
Shah VN, Kamdar PK, Shah N. Assessing the knowledge, attitudes and practice of type 2 diabetes among patients of Saurashtra region, Gujarat. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 2009;29:118-22.
George H, Rakesh P, Krishna M, Alex R, Abraham VJ, George K, et al.
Foot care knowledge and practices and the prevalence of peripheral neuropathy among people with diabetes attending a secondary care rural hospital in southern India. J Family Med Prim Care 2013;2:27-32.
] [Full text]
Ekore RI, Ajayi IO, Arije A, Ekore JO. Knowledge of and attitude to foot care amongst Type 2 diabetes patients attending a university-based primary care clinic in Nigeria. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med 2001;2:3.
Ambigapathy R, Ambigapathy S, Ling H. A knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) study of diabetes mellitus among patients attending Klinik Kesihatan Seri Manjung. NCD Malays 2003;2:6-16.
Jackson IL, Adibe MO, Okonta MJ, Ukwe CV. Knowledge of self-care among type 2 diabetes patients in two states of Nigeria. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2014;12:404.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]